I believe that technology has
reached a dangerous point with theatre.
It has certainly reached a point where it is significantly affecting
it. This happens in a multitude of ways. The first that comes to mind is the use of
projections and videos as part of the set design. There is a good bit of excitement over this
new innovation in the design world of theatre, but for the most part I’m not on
board with it. Every time that I’ve seen
projections or videos used, I found it to be mostly distracting from the
show. It took me out of the space that I
was in, away from the performers, and into a world of media. One of my favorite shows that I’ve gotten to
see is Newsies. In this show, they used projections a number
of times. One of the times, it was used
for Jack Kelly to write the word “STRIKE” across a large chalkboard. He pantomimed writing as the words appeared
on the screen. My question is, why
couldn’t they use a real chalkboard with real chalk? I believe it would have been much more
effective than it was. I found myself
pulled between two worlds: one that was wrapped up in the story and another
that was very aware of a screen pretending to be a chalkboard. This is only one example out of many, but I
really feel that it detracts from the quality of the performance. I realize that theatre is trying to keep up
with what is happening in the world, and—while this is important—I think that
it is losing some of its integrity. I
don’t know what the answer is to this issue, but, with the growth of the film
industry, social media, and other types of technology, theatre seems less
accessible to people. Of course, it isn’t
any less accessible than it was before, but there are options that are much
easier to gain access to. If theatre
molds itself into these more accessible forms of art, then what is the point of
going to see a theatrical performance?
Theatre must keep the things that make it unique. Things happening right there in front of the audience is what makes theatre, well,
theatre.
When I think of when media has
presented something to me that I didn’t experience first person, I (along with
most of America, probably) think of 9/11.
I was quite young when it happened and I had never been to New York
City, so I really didn’t have any personal connection to the event. It was mostly because I didn’t completely understand
what was happening. Several years later,
in high school, I visited NYC for the first time. We visited ground zero and, even though I
understood the seriousness of it, it still seemed so distant and removed from
me. However, several years after that,
my sophomore year of college, I lived in NYC for a year. While I was there I made friends with people
who had lived there for their entire lives.
One day, my friend Cindy happened to mention something about 9/11. As we were walking down the streets of
Manhattan, she told me her story.
Suddenly, the event wasn’t this far away thing that had happened to a
bunch of strangers. I felt the weight of
it as this real life human person spoke her story to me. Now, this wasn’t a performance, but it was a
shared moment between humans with no other distracting influences. Just a girl telling her story. And that was powerful.
Gracie, I just posted this question on Sara's blog, but I want to ask the same thing of you- If there are no apologies made about the fact that using technology makes a theatrical production less based in realism, is it possible for technology to enhance our chances to make an impact since it does broaden the range of subject matter we can explore?
ReplyDelete